Tuesday, 15 October 2013

Prometheus the Trickster

In recent lectures we have discussed polytheism vs. monotheism and how Ancient Greek Religion fits into this. Ancient Greek Religion is polytheistic; there are many different gods and goddesses, compared to monotheistic religions such as Christianity, where there is only one God. Other ways of interpreting polytheism include having multiple names for one deity, for example, Athena Parthenos, Promachos, Ergane, Polias, Poliouchos etc. In Prometheus’ case he has many different ‘nicknames’, a word that could be used to describe the nature in which references to him derive, they include ‘trickster’, ‘protector of mankind’, ‘rebel’, ‘culture hero’, ‘bringer of fire’ and ‘thief’. These could be considered more like terms than epithets, as they range from being both positive and negative descriptions. I think these are terms that have been attributed to Prometheus over time in order for us to understand his nature, rather than as being viewed as epithets attributed to an ancient deity.

The theme that I am most interested in discussing is Prometheus as a ‘trickster’. When contemplating the word ‘trickster’, I immediately thought of foxes, specifically from Japanese folklore. Japanese foxes or Kitsune are considered to be trickster foxes renowned for their mischievous metamorphic abilities. Haga concludes in his articles about Kitsune is that the main qualities attributed to this animal and it’s symbolic representations are the same in the East and the West, ‘Just as in English the fox is used as a symbol of craft in foxy, fox-like, and foxiness’ etc., and so the Japanese have Kôgi (こうぎ), suspicion, literally, to suspect like a fox’ [P224].

                           Some interesting facts that link the myths of Prometheus and Kitsune together are that Kitsune love playing tricks; they like to take things and hide them from people. This is similar to when Prometheus stole fire and hid it in a fennel stalk so that Zeus would not notice. Another similarity is that Kitsune balls, or star balls, which are small white-gold spheres and are a Kitsune's most prized possession, as it is similar to their life force in a ball. If a person manages to find a Kitsune's star ball, they would have the ability to control the Kitsune and make it do their bidding. However, Kitsune hate being stripped of their freedom, and when the Kitsune gets its star ball back, there will be serious consequences for that person. The idea of the Kitsune having its star ball taken is comparable to Prometheus being chained to the rock, as they have both lost their freedom. This is an interesting comparison because it compares mythical figures from two different cultures but their features and attributes are very similar.
                           The Journal of American Folklore notes that Aesop’s fable about the fox deceiving the lion has its own counterpart in a Japanese tale, about a fox that made use of a tiger in a similar way [P224]. I feel that these cultural representations of foxes are very similar to how Prometheus is represented in ancient Greek religion and myth. Grottanelli states that ‘the mythical trickster ‘type’ was ‘discovered’ by 19th-century ethnographers in the native cultures of North America, and then artificially ‘found in the mythologies of other ancient and modern societies’ [P117]. Grottanelli believes that these different figures of various mythologies have been thrown together to form a hybrid, which also blurs the understanding of each separate mythology within its specific cultural context [P117], a notion which I believe can clearly be seen in the context of the Japanese Kitsune and the Greek Prometheus.
                           Another fox figure I thought of when imagining a ‘trickster’ is Disney’s Robin Hood. Throughout the film Robin Hood continuously disguises himself in order to trick his enemies. He disguises himself as a fortune teller in order to steal from Prince John, a beggar in order to fool the sheriff to get information, and as a stalk he is able to take part in the archery tournament without being recognised. Prometheus is like this in the way he gives Zeus the flesh innards rich with the fat of an Ox in an offering at Mecone;

For when the gods and mortal men had a dispute at Mecone, even then Prometheus was forward to cut up a great ox and set portions before them, trying to deceive the mind of Zeus. Before the rest he set flesh and inner parts thick with fat upon the hide, covering them with an ox paunch; [540] but for Zeus he put the white bones dressed up with cunning art and covered with shining fat. Then the father of men and of gods said to him: “Son of Iapetus, most glorious of all lords, good sir, how unfairly you have divided the portions!” [Hes. Th. 535-41]

Both Hesiod’s Theogony and Works and Days talk about Prometheus, and together they present Prometheus as a trickster figure. Hesiod introduces Prometheus in the Theogony as ‘one who dared to match wits with almighty Zeus but ultimately failed’ [Hes. Th. 535-585]. Dougherty notes that Hesiod’s Prometheus, ‘his association with cleverness, trickery and deception, has much in common with the trickster figure that appears in the mythological and folklore traditions of nearly every traditional society – sometimes as a god, sometimes as an animal’ [Dougherty (2006): 33]. Dougherty’s description of a Prometheus in many other cultures relates to the previous association with Japanese Kitsune, both trickster figures and deceivers in their own right. They are also described as ambiguous and anomalous, and even have the ability to shape-shift (Kitsune are also known to take the forms of children and young women to deceive people). Trickster figures usually associate with theft and deception rather than using force or violence. Brown has pointed out that the Greek verb meaning ‘to steal’ (kleptein) really means to remove secretly, and Hesiod’s Prometheus embodies this translation when he steals fire from the gods and hides it in a fennel stalk [Dougherty (2006): 34].
However trickster figures are also portrayed as those who are responsible for disorder and chaos, and are sometimes represented as being dull-witted. This is shown after all Prometheus’ efforts and cleverness; he does not help mankind through his deceptions of Zeus. Not only is Prometheus punished for the theft of fire, but he is also responsible for the suffering of humans and for separating mankind from the ease of the divine world. In this way, Prometheus’ story, in Dougherty’s words; ‘establishes the human world ‘as it is’ – not as it should be’ [Dougherty (2006): 34]. Tricksters usually appear as transformational figures, in which they personify the human struggle to make the world more human. Their tales confirm the meaning of social order through the recognition of that which avoids order. Dougherty expresses that the best way to appreciate the nature of the trickster is to keep them within their own cultural context and by doing this we can discover a lot more about that culture. In terms of ancient Greek culture and Prometheus, his actions both threaten and reaffirm the rules and conventions that constitute archaic Greek culture, particularly the boundaries between humans and gods. Finally, it represents the deception, trickery and the ambiguous nature of the human condition as the Greeks conceived it.
 

Works cited:
Dougherty, C. (2006), Prometheus, ‘Gods and Heroes of the Ancient World’, Routledge

Hesiod’s Theogony

Information about the Trickster Tale

Information on Kitsune
The Journal of American Folklore, ‘Fox Possession in Japan’, American Folklore Society, Vol.13, No.50, Pp.222-5 (Available on JSTOR)
Grottanelli, C. (1983), ‘Tricksters, Scape-Goats, Champions, Saviours’, History of Religions, The University of Chicago Press, Vol.23, No.2, Pp117-139 (Available on JSTOR)

Pictures:
Kitsune woman

Robin Hood 2

Sunday, 6 October 2013

Prometheus Bound For Destruction?

Whilst checking the University Moodle site before my first lecture on Ancient Greek Religion, I come across a cited work by Carol Dougherty titled Prometheus, from the ‘Gods and Heroes of the Ancient World’ series. There were similar books from the series about other Greek deities but Prometheus caught my eye more so than the others. I knew he was a titan, who had been condemned by Zeus to be chained to a rock for eternity, as gods and titans are immortal. That is about as far as my insight into Prometheus went before deciding to write this blog about him. In my previous post I listed the main topics about Prometheus I would like to talk about. Some may have their own posts and some may tie in with lectures, similarly I may link lectures together in order to explain one part of Prometheus’ myth or a specific trait of his.
Firstly, however, I would like to begin by looking at Prometheus’ punishment and why he is subject to it. Some of the ancient texts I will be using to help describe how Prometheus earned his punishment are Aeschylus’ Prometheus Bound, Hesiod’s Theogony and Apollodorus’ Library. I feel that using these sources will not only provide information about Prometheus’ circumstances, but also give us an idea of how contemporary Greeks viewed Prometheus’ story.
Apollodorus states in Library I.vii.1 that 'Prometheus moulded men from water and earth and gave them also fire, hiding it from Zeus in a fennel stalk. But when Zeus learned of it, he ordered Hephaestus to nail his body to Mount Caucasus.' This brief description tells us what Prometheus did to anger Zeus and how he was punished, but it leaves the reader asking many questions as to why Prometheus went behind Zeus' back and why he was punished in such a way. Aeschylus’ Prometheus Bound gives some insight in to these questions. The play opens with Prometheus, Strength, Violence and Hephaestus entering the stage. Strength begins by telling Hephaestus to nail Prometheus to a rock, as commanded by Zeus. Strength continues by briefly stating why Prometheus deserves his punishment: 
‘- an offence,
Intolerable to the gods, for which he now must suffer,
Till he be taught to accept the sovereignty of Zeus
And cease acting as champion of the human race.’ [ll7-10]

Zeus is the King of the gods; therefore he must be obeyed no matter what. Prometheus is under the command of Zeus as he decided to side with him against Zeus’ father, Cronos, and even gave council concerning the imprisonment of the rest of the titans. Yet after all Prometheus had aided Zeus in taking full control, he is punished with being nailed to a rock by Hephaestus’ master handiwork. The offence Strength is talking about is Prometheus’ gift of fire to mankind. He hid it from Zeus in a fennel stalk and gave it to man because Zeus wanted to wipe out humans and create a new race, but Prometheus ‘pitied mortal men’ (l240), which is why he gave them hope, in that they would believe that they could create better lives for themselves, and in giving them fire they were able to create tools in which to advance their society and improve their way of living, as before Prometheus gave them these gifts they were; 
‘At first
Mindless, I gave them mind and reason.
 … They passed like shapes in dreams, confused and purposeless.
 … Such tools and skills I found for men.’ [ll443-465]
Prometheus states that he pitied man because they were to be eradicated by Zeus. This pity may have come from the way his titan brothers, Atlas and Typhon, were dealt with by Zeus. Prometheus notes that they too received punishment from Zeus because they did not side with him against Cronos:
                              ‘The fate of Atlas grieves me – my own brother,
                              Who in the far West stands with his unwieldy load
                              Pressing upon his back, the pillar of heaven and earth.
                              I pity Typhon, that earth-born destroying giant,
                              … I saw him, all his fiery strength subdued by force.
                              Against the united gods he stood,
                              … Threatening to annihilate the throne of Zeus.
                              … Now, crushed under Mount Etna’s roots, near the sea-straight,
                              He lies, a helpless sprawling hulk.’ [ll347-361]
This leads me to consider all the possible reasons as to why Prometheus chose to defy Zeus, even when he knew that he would be punished. Did he truly defy Zeus because he pitied the human race? Or was it out of revenge for his titan brothers? Did Prometheus wish to give humans the god’s powers of fire so that he could use man in order to overthrow the gods somehow? He is described as ‘the champion of the human race’, so did Prometheus wish to be worshipped above Zeus? Prometheus’ name means ‘forethought’, something Strength mocks him for in Aeschylus’ play, as Prometheus knew he would be punished for his actions. Yet he did it anyway. Prometheus knew that Zeus could not kill him. He speaks in Prometheus Bound as if he never liked Zeus to begin with; ‘For great Zeus I care less than nothing’. This leads me to assess his nature as a ‘trickster’, which I will discuss in a future blog entry.
‘Though he was angry, he ceased from the wrath which he had before because Prometheus matched himself in wit with the almighty son of Cronos.’ [Hes. Th. 535]

Works cited:
Aeschylus’ Prometheus Bound and Other Plays, Trans. Vellacott, P. (1961), Penguin books Ltd, Pp20-52 (Online version in Perseus)
Dougherty, C. (2006), Prometheus, ‘Gods and Heroes of the Ancient World’, Routledge
Hesiod’s Theogony